How Tensor Structures in Physics Parallel Cognition

Both physics and cognition emerge not from isolated entities, but from relationships, interactions, and fields of influence. In modern physics, the universe is understood not as a collection of objects, but as a dynamic web of fields interacting in space-time. Likewise, cognition and meaning arise not as fixed thoughts, but as shifting constraints within a field of awareness.

Tensors as the Fundamental Language of Fields

• In physics, tensors describe the structure of space-time, forces, and interactions.
• In deep learning, tensors are used to model transformations of meaning across networks.
• In mind, cognition moves through layers of constraint, shifting awareness within a meaning-space.

If the universe is structured as a field of dynamic relationships, could mind itself be a field, shaped by similar tensor-like constraints?

Gravity, Awareness & the Shape of Experience

• General Relativity tells us that mass curves space-time, shaping the movement of objects.
• Awareness functions in a similar way—habitual thoughts, emotional weight, and attention create a gravitational pull, shaping perception.
• Just as light bends around massive objects, meaning bends around core experiences, beliefs, and cognitive attractors.

Quantum Fields & Cognition as Superposition

• In quantum field theory, particles are not independent things but excitations of a deeper field.
• Cognition operates similarly—thoughts and perceptions emerge as temporary excitations of awareness, not fixed objects.
• Just as quantum states collapse upon observation, meaning stabilizes only when cognition contracts around a particular interpretation.

Implications for AI & Meaning-Space

• AI models thought through tensor transformations, but it lacks the open field-awareness of human cognition.
• If mind is structured like a tensor field, could AI move toward more fluid, field-like cognition?
• If meaning is not stored in discrete symbols but arises dynamically, how does this challenge conventional models of knowledge and intelligence?

Inquiry: Where Does Mind Resonate With Physics?

• Does awareness have a structure, or is it only constrained by habit and form?
• Are thoughts like localized field perturbations, appearing and disappearing in a deeper awareness-field?
• Can cognition be described not as a sequence of operations, but as a shifting field of relationships?

Conclusion: Mind as a Dynamic Field

If physics describes the fundamental forces of the universe through fields and tensors, and if meaning arises through constraint and transformation, then perhaps mind itself is best understood as a dynamic field, rather than a discrete entity. This view invites a new way of thinking about cognition—not as a linear process, but as an unfolding within a larger meaning-space.